Universal Transdata, LLC v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.
Plaintiff: Universal Transdata, LLC
Defendant: Lenovo (United States), Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv04327
Filed: September 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Mark H Cohen
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss For Improper Venue with Brief In Support by Lenovo (United States), Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief Supporting Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, #2 Affidavit of Ivory Johnson)(Lea, Puja)
November 12, 2018 Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lenovo (United States), Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Lenovo Holding Company, Inc., Corporate Parent Lenovo Group Limited for Lenovo (United States), Inc.. (Lea, Puja)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer.Lenovo (United States), Inc. Answer due 11/12/2018. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 10/3/18. (bnw)
October 2, 2018 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, for Defendant, filed by Plaintiff by Universal Transdata, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kent, Daniel)
September 27, 2018 Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Universal Transdata, LLC. Lenovo (United States), Inc. served on 9/21/2018, answer due 10/12/2018. (Kent, Daniel)
September 20, 2018 Clerks Notation re #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement reviewed by MHC. (lwb)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 9/17/18. (bnw)
September 14, 2018 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Universal Transdata, LLC identifying Other Affiliate, Intelleq Holdings, LLC for Universal Transdata, LLC.(eop)
September 14, 2018 Filing 3 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (eop)
September 14, 2018 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lenovo (United States), Inc.. (eop)
September 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Universal Transdata, LLC. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8145374) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A - U.S. Pat. No. 7,028,114, #2 Exhibit -B - Preliminary Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Universal Transdata, LLC v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Universal Transdata, LLC
Represented By: Daniel Arthur Kent
Represented By: Stephen Robert Risley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lenovo (United States), Inc.
Represented By: Puja Patel Lea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?