Holt v. Shanti Kunj, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dakota Holt
Defendant: Shanti Kunj, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv05052
Filed: November 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the right of any party, anytime within the next sixty (60) days, to reopen this action or vacate this order of dismissal. It is further ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order of dismissal and to reopen the action, if necessary. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 12/28/18. (bnw)
December 28, 2018 Civil Case Terminated. (bnw)
December 27, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Dakota Holt (Ehrlich, Craig)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Shanti Kunj, Inc. Answer due 12/28/2018. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 11/27/2018. (rlb)
November 26, 2018 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Dakota Holt. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ehrlich, Craig)
November 8, 2018 Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Dakota Holt. Shanti Kunj, Inc. served on 11/7/2018, answer due 11/28/2018. (Ehrlich, Craig)
November 5, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE Of Filing Certificate of Compliance re: Standing Order in Cases Proceeding Before the Honorable Amy Totenberg by Dakota Holt re #3 Order, (Ehrlich, Craig)
November 5, 2018 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons by Dakota Holt. (Ehrlich, Craig)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: GUIDELINES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE AMY TOTENBERG. You are required to sign and file a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached hereto. To request to file material under seal, the Parties should follow the mechanism described in Section II(J) of Appendix H to the Courts Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 11/5/18. (ddm)
November 1, 2018 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Shanti Kunj, Inc. (rlb)
November 1, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dakota Holt. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8247001) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rlb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holt v. Shanti Kunj, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shanti Kunj, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dakota Holt
Represented By: Craig J. Ehrlich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?