Mills v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
| Laura J. Mills, DDS |
| Unum Group, Corp. and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 1:2018cv05565 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. The Parties' deadline to submit their respective Initial Disclosures is EXTENDED up to and including February 1, 2019. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/15/2019. (rjs)
|
| Filing 12 COURT'S NOTICE Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES. (pdw) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Discovery ends on 6/10/2019.), COUNTERCLAIM against Laura J. Mills, DDS by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company.(Bondurant, Elizabeth) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. Modified on 1/14/2019 to add hyperlink and correct text (rjs). |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Initial Disclosures by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(White, Brendan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Substitute Party. Unum Group is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to SUBSTITUTE Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company as this action's party defendant. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company added. Unum Group, Corp. terminated Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/10/2019. (rjs)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Substitute Party Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company by Unum Group, Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(White, Brendan) Modified on 1/8/2019 to edit text. (cmd) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Unum Group's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED up through and including January 11, 2019. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/3/2019. (rjs)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Unum Group, Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(White, Brendan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Unum Group's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED up through and including January 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 12/13/2018. (rjs)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Unum Group, Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(White, Brendan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Brendan Hanner White on behalf of Unum Group, Corp. (White, Brendan) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Unum Group, Corp. (bnp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Unum Group, Corp. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113E-8314536) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint (Fulton Superior), #2 Exhibit 2 - Sheriff's Entry of Service, #3 Exhibit 3 - General Civil Cover, #4 Exhibit 4 - NOR (Fulton Superior), #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnp) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
