Lino v. Nielsen et al
Rosendo Angel Lino |
Kirstjen Nielsen, Kevin Riddle and Lee Cissna |
1:2018cv05605 |
December 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Administrative Order Staying Civil Proceedings in Light of Lapse Appropriations. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/26/18. (bnw) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 12/12/2018. (btql) |
Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Rosendo Angel Lino. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kevin Riddle. (usw) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kirstjen Nielsen. (usw) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lee Cissna. (usw) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons to US Atty General Whitaker)(usw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Rosendo Angel Lino. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113E-8318491)(Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex1, #2 Exhibit Ex2, #3 Exhibit Ex3, #4 Exhibit Ex4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(usw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.