Stevens v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Anita Marie Stevens |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 1:2018cv05669 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Anita Marie Stevens. (Hogan, John) |
| CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:18-cv-05669-CMS. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (bnp) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Anita Marie Stevens. Commissioner, Social Security Administration served on 12/20/2018, answer due 4/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certified mail return receipts)(Hogan, John) |
Filing 5
Administrative Order Staying Civil Proceedings in Light of Lapse Appropriations. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/26/18. (aaq)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Electronically Issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ddm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Anita Marie Stevens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve the appropriate parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/17/18. (ddm)
|
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anita Marie Stevens. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons - AG, #5 Summons - Defendant, #6 Summons - USAO)(ddm) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (ddm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stevens v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anita Marie Stevens | |
| Represented By: | John Vincent Hogan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
