J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mirza Investment Inc. et al
| J & J Sports Productions, Inc. |
| Nav Kamal and Mirza Investment Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01776 |
| April 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Return of Service Unexecuted by J & J Sports Productions, Inc. as to Mirza Investment Inc.. (Reemsnyder, Ronald) |
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 5/1/2019. (btql)
|
| Clerks Notation re #4 Certificate of Interested Persons, reviewed and approved by LMM. (rvb) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by J & J Sports Productions, Inc.. (tcc) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Nav Kamal. (tcc) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Mirza Investment Inc.. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by J & J Sports Productions, Inc.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8606090) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
