Puha et al v. Monsanto Company
| Gheorghe Puha and Hyesil Kim |
| Monsanto Company |
| 1:2019cv03305 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Orinda D Evans |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| New Civil Action Number in USDC NDCA 3:19-cv-5346 (aar) |
| Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER CTO-146 from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Case transferred to the Northern District of California for inclusion in MDL No. 2741. (tcc) |
| Case transferred electronically to the Northern District of California for inclusion in MDL 2741. (tcc) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (tcc) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gheorghe Puha. Monsanto Company waiver mailed on 7/25/2019, answer due 9/23/2019. (Johnson, Jonathan) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for Review, to District Judge Orinda D. Evans. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Gheorghe Puha and Hyesil Kim. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-8808100) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
