Chase v. Infomart, Inc.
| Megan Chase |
| Infomart, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03589 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Christopher C Bly |
| Clarence Cooper |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS #4 Defendant Infomart, Inc.'s unopposed motion to extend the answer deadline. InfoMart, Inc. shall have through and including October 28, 2019 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. ORDERED BY Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on September 19, 2019. (jtj)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Infomart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bateman, Connor) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Megan Chase. Infomart, Inc. served on 9/6/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. (Dorsen, Clifton) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Infomart, Inc.. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Megan Chase. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8850211) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
