Zyrcuits IP LLC v. Sengled USA, Inc.
| Zyrcuits IP LLC |
| Sengled USA, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv04393 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Andrew S. Curfman. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 11/20/2019. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(rjs)
|
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Andrew S. Curfman Pro Hac Vice. Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.. Attorney Andrew S. Curfman added appearing on behalf of Zyrcuits IP LLC (pmb) |
| Filing 7 Court's NOTICE Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES.(pdw) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Andrew S. Curfman Pro Hac Vice. Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.by Zyrcuits IP LLC. (Burt, Jacqueline) |
| RETURN of #5 APPLICATION for Admission of Andrew S. Curfman Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-9001316). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. to attorney for correction re: local counsel. (pmb) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission of Andrew S. Curfman Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-9001316). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.by Zyrcuits IP LLC. (Burt, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Zyrcuits IP LLC.(eop) |
| Filing 3 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Sengled USA, Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Zyrcuits IP LLC. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-8970553) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A -'307 Patent, #2 Exhibit -B -Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zyrcuits IP LLC v. Sengled USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zyrcuits IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Knapp Burt |
| Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
| Represented By: | Andrew S. Curfman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sengled USA, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
