McElroy et al v. Courtney Ajinca Events LLC et al
| Bryan Flores and Nicholas McElroy |
| Courtney Ajinca Events LLC, Courtney Ajinca and Danika Berry |
| 1:2019cv05094 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE Of Filing Certificate of Compliance by Bryan Flores, Nicholas McElroy (Aron, Alexandria) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. All counsel of record and pro se parties are required to sign and file, within 10 days after entry of this Order, a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached as Exhibit B. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 10/2/19. (jpa)
|
| Filing 2 AO Form 121 forwarded to Registrar. (ah) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing re #2 A.O. Form 121 Copyright. (ah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Nicholas McElroy and Bryan Flores (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9070392). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
