Lucas et al v. Urban One, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dominique Hinton and Desiree Lucas
Defendant: Urban One, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv05271
Filed: November 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Justin S Anand
Referring Judge: Steve C Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to file an answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED through January 21, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 1/14/2020. (rjs)
January 13, 2020 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Urban One, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A)(Hebert, Shawntel)
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to file an answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED through January 13, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 12/12/2019. (rjs)
December 11, 2019 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Urban One, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order (Exhibit A))(Hebert, Shawntel)
November 22, 2019 Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Desiree Lucas, Dominique Hinton. Urban One, Inc. served on 11/21/2019, answer due 12/12/2019. (Buckley, Edward)
November 21, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Anne Boring on behalf of Dominique Hinton, Desiree Lucas (Boring, Anne)
November 21, 2019 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Urban One, Inc. (jap)
November 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Desiree Lucas and Dominique Hinton, individually, and on behalf of all all similarly situated persons (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9111868). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join as to Desiree Lucas, #2 Exhibit B - Consent to Join as Dominique Hinton, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lucas et al v. Urban One, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dominique Hinton
Represented By: Anne Boring
Represented By: Edward D. Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desiree Lucas
Represented By: Anne Boring
Represented By: Edward D. Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Urban One, Inc.
Represented By: Shawntel R. Hebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?