Rogers v. Conway
| Curtis Lee Rogers |
| R.L. (Butch) Conway |
| 1:2019cv05383 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| John K Larkins |
| William M Ray |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #3 Non-Final Report and Recommendation. The Court DENIES Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis #2 . The Court further ORDERS Petitioner's custodian to withdraw the $5.00 filing fee from Petitioner's inmate account and transmit those funds to the Clerk of this Court within thirty (30) days of this Order. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 1/2/20. (rlb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Curtis Lee Rogers re #5 Order on Report and Recommendation. (rlb) |
| Submission of #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Curtis Lee Rogers, to District Judge William M. Ray II. (rlb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Curtis Lee Rogers re #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rlb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Non-Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 12/3/19. (rlb)
|
|
Filing 3
NON-FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending #2 Petitioner's request to proceed IFP be DENIED. Should the District Court adopt this R&R, it is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's custodian be ORDERED to withdraw the $5.00 filing fee from Petitioner's inmate account and transmit those funds to the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of any such order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 12/3/19. (rlb) Modified on 12/4/2019 to edit link (rlb).
|
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (rlb) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Curtis Lee Rogers. (rlb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Curtis Lee Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(rlb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. Conway | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: R.L. (Butch) Conway | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Curtis Lee Rogers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
