Whitson v. Unknown
| James Whitson |
| Unknown |
| 1:2019cv05509 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Christopher C Bly |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #1 Complaint and #4 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly for IFP and frivolity review. (jed) |
| Filing 4 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by James Whitson. (jed) |
Filing 3
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis stamped with the case number for this action. Plaintiff is ORDERED to either pay the fees noted above/ or complete and submit the application to proceed in forma pauperis/ within 30 days of the date this Order is entered. The Clerk is DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the undersigned upon receipt of the required fees or application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or at the expiration of the aforementioned time period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 1/7/2019. Forms sent to party: Affidavit and Authorization. (jed)
|
|
Notification of Docket Correction re #2 Standing Order, Standing Order signed by Judge Grimberg entered in error. This case is currently before the magistrate judge.. (smj)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James Whitson re #3 Order and Forms Sent. (jed) |
|
Filing 2
FILED IN ERROR STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. All counsel of record and pro se parties are required to sign and file, within 10 days after entry of this Order, a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached as Exhibit B. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 10/02/19. (smj) Modified on 1/7/2020 (smj).
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James Whitson re #2 Standing Order regarding civil litigation. (smj) |
| ---ENTRY MADE IN ERROR: Incorrect Case ---USM forms and proposed summons received by clerk. (aaq) Modified on 12/13/2019 to edit text. (aaq). |
| Submission of #1 Complaint to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly for IFP review. (ah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James Whitson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ah) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitson v. Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Whitson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
