Annamalai et al v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
| Parvathi Sivanadiyan and Annamalai Annamalai |
| Unnamed Defendant(s) |
| 1:2019mi00164 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 02 U.S.C. ยง 437 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #1 MOTION to Reopen Case; MOTION for Order to Show Cause; MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing and MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief for Review, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (eop) |
| Filing 1 Verified and Emergency MOTION of targets, Annamalai Annamalai and Parvathi Sivanadiyan to Reopen Case from the Final Order/Judgment under the doctrines of Fraud Upon Court(s); MOTION for Order to Show Cause by the government attorneys and the lead case agent, Ms. Jacqueline H. reynolds, about why the matters surrounding this action should not be recommended for investigation and prosecution by Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TICTA) with a MOTION for Evidentary Hearing and MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief sought by Annamalai Annamalai and Parvathi Sivanadiyan. (Attachments: #1 Motion - Part 2, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit -Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Modified text on 11/6/2019 (eop). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
