Riles v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Jonathan Devon Riles
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv03851
Filed: September 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Justin S Anand
Referring Judge: Steven D Grimberg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 09/28/2020. (ddm) (ADI)
September 28, 2020 Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Jonathan Devon Riles. Commissioner, Social Security Administration served on 9/28/2020, answer due 1/6/2021. (Comerford, Ida)
September 21, 2020 Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 RCC, #2 US Attorney)(bdb)
September 21, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Jonathan Devon Riles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, this action shall proceed as any other civil action, and Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without prepayment of a filing fee. Plaintiff is represented by counsel in this action. Accordingly, counsel for Plaintiff is appointed to effect service of process upon Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 9/21/2020. (bdb)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 09/01/2020. (rvb)
September 18, 2020 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (rvb)
September 17, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Jonathan Devon Riles. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Summons Attorney General, #5 Summons US Attorney, #6 Summons RCC, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(rvb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riles v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Devon Riles
Represented By: Ida Comerford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?