DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation
Plaintiff: DigiMedia Tech, LLC
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation
Case Number: 1:2020cv04995
Filed: December 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: William M Ray
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 281
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (adg) (ADI)
January 22, 2021 Filing 8 Electronic Summons Issued as to Panasonic Corporation. (ah)
January 21, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE Of Filing by DigiMedia Tech, LLC re #1 Complaint,,,, CORRECTED Exhibit H - U.S. Patent No. 6,744,818 (Kent, Daniel)
January 21, 2021 Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC (Kent, Daniel)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 12/22/20. (ah)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. (rvb)
December 9, 2020 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DigiMedia Tech, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DigiMedia Tech, LLC by DigiMedia Tech, LLC.(rvb)
December 9, 2020 Filing 2 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (Attachments: #1 AO 120 Part 2) (rvb)
December 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-10473128) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A U.S. Patent No. 6,914,635, #2 Exhibit B U.S. Patent No. 6,545,706, #3 Exhibit C U.S. Patent No. 7,715,476, #4 Exhibit D U.S. Patent No. 6,473,532, #5 Exhibit E U.S. Patent No. 6,567,086, #6 Exhibit F U.S. Patent No. 6,606,287, #7 Exhibit G U.S. Patent No. 6,741,250, #8 Exhibit H U.S. Patent No. 6,744,818, #9 Exhibit I Claim Chart v '635 Patent, #10 Exhibit J Claim Chart v '706 Patent, #11 Exhibit K Claim Chart v '476 Patent, #12 Exhibit L Claim Chart v '532 Patent, #13 Exhibit M Claim Chart v '086 Patent, #14 Exhibit N Claim Chart v '287 Patent, #15 Exhibit O Claim Chart v '250 Patent, #16 Exhibit P Claim Chart v '818 Patent, #17 Civil Cover Sheet)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DigiMedia Tech, LLC
Represented By: Cortney Scott Alexander
Represented By: Daniel Arthur Kent
Represented By: Stephen Robert Risley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?