DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation
DigiMedia Tech, LLC |
Panasonic Corporation |
1:2020cv04995 |
December 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
William M Ray |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 281 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (adg) (ADI) |
Filing 8 Electronic Summons Issued as to Panasonic Corporation. (ah) |
Filing 7 NOTICE Of Filing by DigiMedia Tech, LLC re #1 Complaint,,,, CORRECTED Exhibit H - U.S. Patent No. 6,744,818 (Kent, Daniel) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC (Kent, Daniel) |
Filing 5 Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 12/22/20. (ah) |
Filing 4 NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. (rvb) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DigiMedia Tech, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DigiMedia Tech, LLC by DigiMedia Tech, LLC.(rvb) |
Filing 2 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (Attachments: #1 AO 120 Part 2) (rvb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by DigiMedia Tech, LLC. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-10473128) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A U.S. Patent No. 6,914,635, #2 Exhibit B U.S. Patent No. 6,545,706, #3 Exhibit C U.S. Patent No. 7,715,476, #4 Exhibit D U.S. Patent No. 6,473,532, #5 Exhibit E U.S. Patent No. 6,567,086, #6 Exhibit F U.S. Patent No. 6,606,287, #7 Exhibit G U.S. Patent No. 6,741,250, #8 Exhibit H U.S. Patent No. 6,744,818, #9 Exhibit I Claim Chart v '635 Patent, #10 Exhibit J Claim Chart v '706 Patent, #11 Exhibit K Claim Chart v '476 Patent, #12 Exhibit L Claim Chart v '532 Patent, #13 Exhibit M Claim Chart v '086 Patent, #14 Exhibit N Claim Chart v '287 Patent, #15 Exhibit O Claim Chart v '250 Patent, #16 Exhibit P Claim Chart v '818 Patent, #17 Civil Cover Sheet)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DigiMedia Tech, LLC | |
Represented By: | Cortney Scott Alexander |
Represented By: | Daniel Arthur Kent |
Represented By: | Stephen Robert Risley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.