Orso v. Watkins et al
| Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com doing business as Rex Venture Group, LLC |
| Todd Disner and Tahron Watkins |
| Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. |
| 1:2021mi00039 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1963 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| WRIT of Execution issued in the amount of $13,473.69 as to Tahron Watkins. Sent by Certified mail to Joseph J. Dinardo, counsel for plaintiff. Certified mail number 9171999991703257183914. (bdb) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Writ of of Execution by Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.. (Dinardo, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION of Foreign Judgment filed by Matthew E. Orso. (Final Judgment is entered against Defendant, Tahron Watkins in the amount of $13,473.69. (Attachments: #1 Amended Receivership Order Appointing Successor Receiver, #2 Order Granting Motion to Sell Judgments, #3 Assignment of Judgment, #4 Letter to Clerk, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Modified text on 5/17/2021 (eop). |
| Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (eop) Modified date closed on 5/17/2021 (eop). |
| Filing Fee Paid: $ 49.00, receipt number AGANDC-10976017 (eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
