ADMI, Inc. v. Surterra Holdings, Inc.
| ADMI, Inc. |
| Surterra Holdings, Inc. doing business as Parallel Brands |
| 1:2022cv01202 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #6 MOTION to Dismiss to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (pdw) |
DOCKET ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time re #9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time File Reply to ADMI's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. The parties are reminded that any future joint/consent motions must be accompanied by a proposed order. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 5/23/2022. (pdw)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time File Reply to ADMI's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Surterra Holdings, Inc.. (Strickland, Vernon) |
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Surterra Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 3, #2 Exhibit 4)(Strickland, Vernon) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by ADMI, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Beck, Philip) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief In Support by Surterra Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Strickland, Vernon) |
| Filing 5 COURT'S NOTICE Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES. (pdw) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons in a Civil Action , as to Surterra Holdings, Inc., d/b/a/ Parallel Brands. (Beck, Philip) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Surterra Holdings, Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by ADMI, Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Compel Arbitration Award filed by ADMI, Inc.. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11686855) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A, #2 Exhibit -B, #3 Exhibit -C, #4 Exhibit -D, #5 Exhibit -E, #6 Exhibit -F, #7 Exhibit -G, #8 Exhibit -H, #9 Exhibit -I, #10 Exhibit -J, #11 Exhibit -K, #12 Exhibit -L, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ADMI, Inc. v. Surterra Holdings, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ADMI, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Philip Edward Beck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Surterra Holdings, Inc. doing business as Parallel Brands | |
| Represented By: | Vernon M. Strickland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
