Douglas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Erica Etai Douglas |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv02866 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Linda T Walker |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that the action be DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (kxm)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #3 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 8/24/2022. (kxm)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Erica Etai Douglas re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #6 Clerk's Judgment. (kxm) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (kxm) |
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Order ruling on IFP,, Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 8/5/2022. (kxm)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis, FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Complaint. It is RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 8/5/2022. (kxm)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Erica Etai Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kxm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Erica Etai Douglas re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Complaint, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (kxm) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (nmb) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erica Etai Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Douglas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erica Etai Douglas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
