Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dishinger et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Ann Dishinger, Jerrold I. Palmer, Lawrence M. Palmer and Ann M. Dishinger |
1:2022cv03258 |
August 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Thomas W Thrash |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CONSENT JUDGMENT as to Defendant Lawrence M. Palmer in the amount of $99,723.66. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 10/12/2022. (jra) |
Filing 14 CONSENT JUDGMENT as to Defendant Jerrold I. Palmer in the amount of $107,701.44. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 10/12/2022. (jra) |
![]() |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Margaret Gembala Nelson re #13 Order on Motion to Approve Consent Judgment, #14 Consent Judgment, #15 Consent Judgment. (jra) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer by Ann M. Dishinger. (Kelehear, Zachary) Modified on 10/11/2022 (jra). |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #9 APPLICATION for Admission of Todd S Pugh Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12095399). Attorney Todd S. Pugh added appearing on behalf of Lawrence M. Palmer (pdt) |
Filing 10 Motion For Entry Of Consent Judgment As to Defendants Jerrold I. Palmer and Lawrence M. Palmer by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Murnahan, W.) Modified on 10/3/2022 (jra). |
Filing 9 APPLICATION for Admission of Todd S Pugh Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12095399).by Lawrence M. Palmer. (Habachy, Joseph) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
![]() |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Susan Pavlow re #8 Order on Application for Admission PHV. (jra) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #7 APPLICATION for Admission of Susan Pavlow Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12054019). Attorney Susan M. Pavlow added appearing on behalf of Ann M. Dishinger (pdt). |
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Admission of Susan Pavlow Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12054019).by Ann M. Dishinger. (Kelehear, Zachary) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 6 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Susan M. Pavlow. Clerk to follow-up by 9/9/2022. (cdg) |
Filing 5 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Todd S. Pugh. Clerk to follow-up by 9/9/2022. (cdg) |
Filing 4 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Margaret Gembala Nelson. Clerk to follow-up by 9/9/2022. (cdg) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission. Ann M. Dishinger waiver mailed on 8/15/2022, answer due 10/14/2022. (Loomis, Madison) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ann Dishinger. (gas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Consent of Defendant Jerrold I. Palmer, #2 Final Judgment as to Defendant of Jerrold I. Palmer, #3 Consent of Defendant Lawrence M. Palmer, #4 Final Judgment as to Defendant Lawrence M. Palmer, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(gas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.