Ridley v. Warden
Petitioner: Sherman Lee Ridley
Respondent: The Warden
Case Number: 1:2022cv03787
Filed: September 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Sarah E Geraghty
Referring Judge: J Elizabeth McBath
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan Hobbs Hill on behalf of Warden (Hill, Meghan)
September 29, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Sherman Lee Ridley re #6 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (nmb)
September 29, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Warden re #6 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Certified mail number 91 7199 9991 7032 5718 6847. (nmb)
September 29, 2022 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Attorney General of the State ofGeorgia re #6 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Certified mail number 91 7199 9991 7032 5718 6854. (nmb)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of the petition and this Order by certified mail to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Georgia. Respondent is ORDERED to (1) show cause within 60 DAYS of the receipt of this Order why the petition should not be granted, and (2) transmit to this Court all available pleadings, transcripts, and decisions needed to determine the issues raised. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 9/28/2022. (nmb)
September 20, 2022 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Southern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00123. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for the transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for further consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 09/20/2022. (jlh) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 9/20/2022.]
September 20, 2022 Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Sherman Lee Ridley. (maa) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 9/20/2022.]
September 20, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sherman Lee Ridley. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(maa) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 9/20/2022.]
September 20, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Sherman Lee Ridley.(maa) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 9/20/2022.]
September 20, 2022 Submission of #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (aar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ridley v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sherman Lee Ridley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Warden
Represented By: Meghan Hobbs Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?