Adan v. American White Government
| Saleeban Adan |
| American White Government |
| 1:2023cv03851 |
| August 28, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Regina D Cannon |
| William M Ray |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered denying and dismissing the writ of habeas corpus. (dob)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4
ORDER approving and adopting #2 Final Report and Recommendation; dismissing the action without prejudice; denying a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 10/24/2023. (dob)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Saleeban Adan re #5 Clerk's Judgment, #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (dob) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (dob) |
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Saleeban Adan, to District Judge William M. Ray II. (sll) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Order ruling on IFP,, Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 10/12/2023. (dob)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis, FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Saleeban Adan be DISMISSED without prejudice and a certificate of appealability be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 10/12/2023. (dob)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Saleeban Adan re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Saleeban Adan, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation,. (dob) |
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity Determination to Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon. (lwb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Saleeban Adan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adan v. American White Government | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Saleeban Adan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: American White Government | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
