Future Madam Potus v. Georgia Election Division et al
| Future Madam Potus |
| Georgia Election Division, Chris Harvey and Meaghan Kelling |
| 1:2024cv05034 |
| November 1, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and #5 MOTION to Dismiss Order and for Appointment of Counsel to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (jpk) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 12/3/24. (klb)
|
|
Filing 3
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Future Madam Potus. The Court Ordered #2 plaintiff to submit a revised request form, or submit the full civil filing fee of $405 on or before November 22, 2024. The undersigned REPORTS that the above deadline has passed and plaintiff has failed to submit a revised Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs or the $405 filing fee. Because the information in the Application #1 is insufficient to find plaintiff is a pauper, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that plaintiff's request be DENIED and that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See N.D. Ga. Civ. R. 41.3(A)(2) (permitting court to dismiss civil case for want of prosecution if a plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney shall, after notice,... fail or refuse to obey a lawful order of the court in the case). Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 12/3/24. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Future Madam Potus re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #4 Order for Service of Final Report and Recommendation. (klb) |
| Submission of #2 Order to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (jpk) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Order and for Appointment of Counsel by Future Madam Potus. (pdt) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER - the Court ORDERS plaintiff to submit a completed form application to proceed IFP and affidavit of indigence, or submit the full filing fee of $405.00 on or before November 22, 2024. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail plaintiff the appropriate financial affidavit and application, together with a copy of this Order. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for want of prosecution. ( Forms sent to party: Affidavit to Proceed IFP; ) Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/5/24. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Future Madam Potus re #2 Order and Forms Sent. (klb) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (pdt) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Future Madam Potus. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (BAR Case), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
