Jorgensen v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
| David John Jorgensen |
| CitiMortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Pendergast & Associates, P.C. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
| 2:2012cv00236 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Forsyth |
| Richard W. Story |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 9/13/2013. (vld)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING Defendant Pendergrast's 5 Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED. Plaintiffs request for injunctive relief having been DENIED, the Clerk is DIRECTED to refer the case to the next available Magistrate Judge, pursuant to Standing Order Number 08-01. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 07/19/13. (sk)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Emergency Injunctive Relief, as Plaintiff has failed to allege facts that would demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the claims he has asserted. Moreover, he has failed to show that he has prepared to give security as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 4/1/2013. (vld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
