Carson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Plaintiff: Rowena Carson
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart
Case Number: 2:2021cv00164
Filed: July 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: J Clay Fuller
Referring Judge: Steve C Jones
2 Judge: Richard W Story
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Antoinette Trott on behalf of Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Trott, Antoinette)
September 24, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. Discovery ends on 2/22/2022.(Davis, Chandra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order (Minute entry) ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Wal-Mart Answer due 9/24/2021; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP Answer due 9/24/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 8/25/2021. (clk)
August 24, 2021 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Davis, Chandra)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Steve C. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Richard W. Story no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 2:21-CV-164-SCJ-JCF. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/4/2021. (ddm)
July 27, 2021 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rowena Carson. (rsg)
July 27, 2021 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(rsg)
July 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Rowena Carson. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11138482) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rowena Carson
Represented By: James Wickliffe Cauthorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Represented By: Antoinette Trott
Represented By: Chandra Cain Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart
Represented By: Antoinette Trott
Represented By: Chandra Cain Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?