Redden v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
Rodger Dale Redden |
Governor Nathan Deal and Georgia Department of Corrections |
4:2018cv00174 |
July 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Rome Office |
Chattooga |
Walter E Johnson |
Harold L Murphy |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis, allowing Plaintiff to proceed IFP, however, Plaintiff is obligated to pay $350.00 as funds are deposited into Inmate account. The Warden or the designee shall collect the monthly payments and remit to Clerk until $350.00 is paid in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 8/6/18. (klb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rodger Dale Redden re #3 Order. (klb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Warden, Hays State Prison re #3 Order. (klb) |
Submission of #1 Complaint, #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (dob) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Rodger Dale Redden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(dob) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rodger Dale Redden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.