Collazo v. Westlake Financial et al
Ricardo Collazo |
Does 1-10 and Westlake Financial |
4:2019cv00116 |
June 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Harold L Murphy |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER directing the Clerk to Administratively Terminate this action pending the finalization of their settlement. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 7/30/2019. (dob) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Ricardo Collazo (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Ricardo Collazo. Westlake Financial served on 6/17/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 4 Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons. Approved by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 6/5/19. (jta) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Westlake Financial. (jta) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ricardo Collazo. (jta) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Ricardo Collazo. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8707774) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jta) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.