Doe v. Manning
Jane Doe |
Heidi Manning |
4:2021cv00179 |
September 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Eleanor L Ross |
P.I.: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER granting Defendant's #12 Motion for Extension of Time, up to and including 11/23/2021, to answer, object, or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 11/8/2021. (bgt) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, through and including November 23, 2021 by Heidi Manning. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Treese, Edwin) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Heidi Manning Answer due 11/9/2021. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 10/25/2021. (ayw) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Heidi Manning. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Treese, Edwin) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Edwin Andrew Treese on behalf of Heidi Manning (Treese, Edwin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Wayne Steven Melnick on behalf of Heidi Manning (Melnick, Wayne) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Heidi Manning answer due 10/26/2021. (ceo) |
Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Jane Doe. Heidi Manning served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. (Atkinson, Brian) Modified to edit text on 10/12/2021 (ceo). |
Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Heidi Manning. (ceo) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Jane Doe (Atkinson, Brian) |
Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
Submission of #2 MOTION for Protective Order, to District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (tmf) |
Clerks Notation re #3 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosures by Jane Doe. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons by Jane Doe. (tmf) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Protective Order, MOTION to Proceed Anonymously by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(tmf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Jane Doe. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11264351) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Doe v. Manning | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jane Doe | |
Represented By: | Brian Atkinson |
Represented By: | Emily Margaret Hetherington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Heidi Manning | |
Represented By: | Edwin Andrew Treese |
Represented By: | Wayne Steven Melnick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.