Seraphin et al v. Morris Publishing Group, LLC, et al.
| Ed Slavin and Judith Seraphin |
| Morris Publishing Group, LLC, et al. |
| Morris Publishing Group, LLC, et al. |
| Office of the U.S. Trustee |
| 1:2010cv00056 |
| April 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Richmond |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 22 Bill of Costs/Motion. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment against Appellant Ed Slavin in favor of Appellees for $11,784.56. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 04/16/2012. (thb)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 7 MOTION for an Order Awarding Damages and Cost for Frivolous Appeal Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8020; denying as moot 13 Motion to Strike; directing to Clerk to close thi s case and terminate all pending motions; and directing Appellees to submit a detail accounting of all costs and fees directly related to the now-dismissed appeal, in addition to an appropriate affidavit attached thereto, within 14 days from the date of this Order. Appellants will then have 14 days from the date of Appellees' submission to file their objections. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/28/2011. (thb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
