Lane v. Jeanes

Respondent: John Jeanes
Petitioner: Dominique Lane
Case Number: 1:2013cv00022
Filed: February 11, 2013
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Augusta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: W. Leon Barfield
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 8, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 15 Report and Recommendation; dismissing without prejudice the instant petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254; and denying a COA in this case. This civil action shall be closed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/08/2013. (thb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane v. Jeanes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Jeanes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dominique Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?