Morris v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
| Robert D. Morris |
| Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia |
| 1:2014cv00196 |
| October 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Jefferson |
| Brian K. Epps |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 41 43 Motions for Settlement, granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Attorney Fees, and approves their settlement. Plaintiffs' counsel may recover a total of $37,896.18 in attorneys' fees and $475.00 in costs from Defendant as part of the settlement. This case is hereby Dismissed with prejudice and stands closed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 3/21/17. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss; granting 39 Motion to Dismiss Some, But Not All Plaintiffs. The following Plaintiffs are dismissed without prejudice from this matter: Kenneth Barnes; Demarcus Chavous; Jonathan Dewberry; Steve Fowler; Richard Germany; Ryan Goodson; David Hart; Larry Johnson; Jack Maddox; Stephen Reed; Frederick Shaver, Jr.; Michael Tomaszewski; Spencer Johnson; Robert King; and Alex Zwaniger. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 06/03/2016. (thb)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER STAYING CASE until December 14, 2015. The parties are directed to jointly file a status report by December 14, 2015 detailing the progress of their settlement discussions. Status Report due by 12/14/2015. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/17/2015. (thb)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER staying case until November 16, 2015. The parties are directed to jointly file a status report by November 16, 2015 detailing the progress of their settlement discussions. Status Report due by 11/16/2015. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/04/2015. (thb)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER STAYING CASE for sixty (60) days. The Court directs the parties to file a status report by Friday, October 9, 2015 detailing their progress in the event the settlement process has not concluded before that date. Status Report due by 10/9/2015. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/11/2015. (thb)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER cautioning defense counsel to take all deadlines in this case seriously and respond as soon as possible to all correspondence from opposing counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 12/12/14. (cmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morris v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert D. Morris | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy S. McKenzie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia | |
| Represented By: | Jody May Smitherman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
