Harrell v. United States of America
Harrell |
United States of America |
Wendell Laturis Harrell |
1:2016cv00062 |
May 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of the Respondent. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 03/20/2017. (thb) |
Filing 11 ORDER adopting #9 Report and Recommendations; granting #3 Motion to Dismiss. The Court denies a COA in this case, closes this civil action, and directs the Clerk to enter final judgment in favor of Respondent. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/20/2017. (thb) |
Filing 10 ORDER directing service of the #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 02/21/2017. (thb) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the #3 MOTION to Dismiss be granted, that the #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) be dismissed, this civil action be closed, and a final judgment be entered in favor of Respondent. Objections to R&R due by 3/10/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 02/21/2017. (thb) |
Filing 8 ORDER directing the Clerk to update Petitioner's address on the docket. Along with Petitioner's service copy of this Order, the Clerk shall provide a copy the Court's August 17, 2016 Order (doc. no. 5), directing supplemental briefing on the Supreme Court's decision in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016). The deadline to respond to Respondent's #6 Supplemental Brief shall be extended through and including September 26, 2016. Compliance due by 9/26/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 09/07/2016. (thb) |
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Unable to Forward. Mail sent to Wendell Laturis Harrell, Jr. re #5 Order. (thb) Modified on 9/6/2016 (thb). |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #5 Order, Set Deadlines,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Burglary (Richmond Co Sup Ct 03-RCCR-1136))(Stuchell, James) |
Filing 5 ORDER that Respondent shall have fourteen days from the undersigned date to file a brief explaining what impact, if any, Mathis has on the determination of whether Petitioner's Georgia burglary convictions are valid predicate offenses under the ACCA. Petitioner shall have fourteen days thereafter to respond with his own brief. Compliance due by 8/31/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 08/17/2016. (thb) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing the Petitioner to file a response to the #3 MOTION to Dismiss within fourteen days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/26/2016. (thb) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/9/2016. (thb) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Harrell's 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion by United States of America. Responses due by 7/22/2016. (Stuchell, James) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Harrell's 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. (cmr) |
Filing 2 ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall serve the United States Attorney with this Order and a copy of the #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). The Court directs the Respondent to file an answer or response within sixty days of the date of this Order. Compliance due by 7/12/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 05/13/2016. (thb) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Wendell Laturis Harrell, Jr.(thb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.