Warthen v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Darlene Garnett Warthen
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 1:2017cv00085
Filed: July 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Augusta Office
County: McDuffie
Presiding Judge: Brian K. Epps
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's 3 Report and Recommendations and denying as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darlene Garnett Warthen. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as time-barred and this civil action stands CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/28/2017. (pts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warthen v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darlene Garnett Warthen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?