Warthen v. Berryhill
Darlene Garnett Warthen |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
1:2017cv00085 |
July 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
McDuffie |
Brian K. Epps |
J. Randal Hall |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's 3 Report and Recommendations and denying as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darlene Garnett Warthen. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as time-barred and this civil action stands CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/28/2017. (pts) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Warthen v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darlene Garnett Warthen | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.