Raley v. Chicago Bridge and Iron
Plaintiff: Quilla Raley
Defendant: Chicago Bridge and Iron
Case Number: 1:2017cv00133
Filed: October 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Augusta Office
County: Burke
Presiding Judge: Brian K. Epps
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER STAYING CASE. Parties shall immediately notify this Court should the Bankruptcy Court grant relief from the stay, dismiss Defendant's bankruptcy petition, or otherwise close the bankruptcy proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/17/2018. (jlh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raley v. Chicago Bridge and Iron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quilla Raley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicago Bridge and Iron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?