Hynson v. Social Security Administration
Dorothy Hynson |
Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill |
1:2018cv00135 |
August 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Social Security Administration on 10/16/2018, filed by Dorothy Hynson. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Martin, Charles) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Nancy A. Berryhill answer due 1/24/2019. (jlh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Otto Woelke Leithart on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill. (Leithart, Otto) Modified on 10/16/2018 (jlh). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (jlh) |
Filing 4 Summons Submitted (Attachments: #1 Summons - US Attorney, #2 Summons - OGC)(Martin, Charles) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed IFP, subject to objection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 08/28/2018. (jlh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Dorothy Hynson. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order.) REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(jlh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Dorothy Hynson. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet.)(jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.