Rowe v. Ferdianad et al
| George Homer Rowe, Jr. |
| Dr. Ferdianad and Augusta University Hospital |
| 1:2018cv00171 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER directing service of the #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/26/2018. (thb)
|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint, that this case be dismissed without prejudice and that this civil action be closed. Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 11/26/2018. (thb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within thirty days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/12/2018. (maa)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 11/11/2018. (maa) |
| Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by George Homer Rowe, Jr. (jrb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by George Homer Rowe, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(jrb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by George Homer Rowe, Jr.(jrb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
