Tassel v. Saul
| Erik Mitchell Van Tassel |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2019cv00108 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 8/6/2019. (cjc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for W. Daniel Mayes, Fee Amount $200, Receipt No. AUG026579 by Erik Mitchell Van Tassel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(thb) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Heath Statkus on behalf of Andrew Saul (Statkus, Shannon) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (thb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 07/22/2019. (thb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Erik Mitchell Van Tassel. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Erik Mitchell Van Tassel. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet.)(jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
