Teahon et al v. Uber Technologies (GA), INC. et al
| Jeremy Teahon and Amber Teahon |
| Defendant A, Checkr, Inc., Uber Technologies (GA), INC., Defendant B, Defendant C, Uber USA, LLC, Shaunisha D. Brown, Defendant D and Raiser, LLC |
| 1:2020cv00126 |
| September 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/22/2020. (jlh) |
Filing 29
ORDER granting #14 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Clerk is directed to remand this case to the State Court of Richmond County, Georgia, terminate all remaining pending motions, and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/22/2020. (jlh)
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE by Checkr, Inc. Notice of Non-Objection to Motion to Suspend Time (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Windham, Mark) |
| Filing 27 MOTION to Stay /Suspend Time to File Response Pending Remand by Checkr, Inc.. Responses due by 11/3/2020. (Windham, Mark) |
| Filing 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Checkr, Inc. re #24 Response to Motion (Windham, Mark) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #24 Response to Motion. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 10/16/2020. (pts) |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 First MOTION to Remand to State Court Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Checkr, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Windham, Mark) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #13 and #16 Motions for Leave to File. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 09/21/2020. (jlh)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE by Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon re #20 Notice (Other) Corrected (McManus, Hollie) |
| Filing 21 Certificate of Related Cases 3.1 . (McManus, Hollie) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE by Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon re #13 First MOTION for Leave to File. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McManus, Hollie) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Hollie Earl McManus, Jr on behalf of Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon. (McManus, Hollie) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 18 NOTICE by Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon re #16 First MOTION for Leave to File. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hawk, Jacque) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacque D. Hawk on behalf of Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon. (Hawk, Jacque) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 16 First MOTION for Leave to File by Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon. Responses due by 9/30/2020. (Hawk, Jacque) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 15 ***ENTERED IN ERROR*** NOTICE by Amber Teahon Notice of Related Case (McManus, Hollie) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 14 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon. Responses due by 9/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A through C)(McManus, Hollie) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Leave to File by Amber Teahon, Jeremy Teahon. Responses due by 9/30/2020. (McManus, Hollie) Modified on 9/16/2020 (thb). |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #16 First MOTION for Leave to File, #13 First MOTION for Leave to File. (thb) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Raiser, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Jury Demand)(Anderson, Carl) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Uber USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Jury Demand)(Anderson, Carl) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Uber Technologies (GA), INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Jury Demand)(Anderson, Carl) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Checkr, Inc. answer due 10/21/2020.; terminating as moot #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/10/2020. (pts)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Checkr, Inc.. Responses due by 9/24/2020. (Windham, Mark) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Checkr, Inc. Statement of Realted Cases (Windham, Mark) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Checkr, Inc.. Responses due by 9/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Windham, Mark) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (thb) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Checkr, Inc.. (Windham, Mark) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance re #2 Notice due by 9/14/2020. (jlh) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Shaunisha D. Brown answer due 9/20/2020. (thb) |
|
Filing 3
RULE 26(f)ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 09/04/2020. (Attachments: #1 Blank forms for new civil case filings) (thb)
|
| Filing 2 REMOVAL NOTICE to all Counsel of Record re #1 Notice of Removal. Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 9/14/2020. (thb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Checkr, Inc. from State Court of Richmond County, GA, case number 2020RCSC00884. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AGASDC-2918453), filed by Checkr, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, Complaint, Amended Complaint, Answers, Order, and Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Certification of Consent to Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Certification of Consent to Removal, #4 Exhibit D - Certification of Consent to Removal, #5 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #6 Exhibit F - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(thb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/8/2020: #8 Exhibit A- Summons, Complaint, Amended Complaint, Answers, Order, Voluntary Dismissal, and Civil Cover Sheet) (thb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
