Reaves v. Foster et al
| Kathy Juanita Reaves |
| Richmond County Sheriff Office, Cordero Cartez Foster, Michael Daniel Hucko, Richard R. Roundtree and Richmond County Sheriff Department |
| 1:2021cv00120 |
| August 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS #11 as its opinion and Denies Plaintiff's renewed #7 , #9 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have twenty-one calendar day from the date of service of this Order to pay the $402.00 filing fee. Should Plaintiff fail to make timely payment, the Court Directs the Clerk to dismiss the case without prejudice, terminate the pending motion to amend #13 , and close this civil action on the twenty-fifth day after the date of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 9/24/2021. (ca)
|
| Set Deadline: Compliance re #14 due by 10/19/2021. (ca) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by Kathy Juanita Reaves. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint.) REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps. (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2021: #2 Corrected Main Document) (jlh). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER directing service of the #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/1/2021. (ca)
|
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff's renewed #7 , #9 MOTIONS for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be Denied, and Plaintiff be Directed to pay the full filing if she intends to pursue her complaint. Should the District Judge adopt this recommendation and Plaintiff fail to pay the filing fee within twenty-one days after that final action, the case should be Dismissed without prejudice and Closed. Objections to R&R due by 9/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/1/2021. (ca) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER finding as moot Plaintiff's #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/1/2021. (ca)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kathy Juanita Reaves. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(ca) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply by Kathy Juanita Reaves. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(ca) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kathy Juanita Reaves. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(ca) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court directs Plaintiff to submit a new motion to proceed IFP within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. PLRA due by 9/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 08/19/2021. (Attachment: #1 AO 239 Form.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officerfor possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Set Deadline: Compliance due by 8/25/2021. (ca) |
|
Filing 4
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 8/11/2021. (ca)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Submitted. (ca) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kathy Juanita Reaves. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kathy Juanita Reaves.(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
