Cortes-Morales v. Hastings

Petitioner: Jorge Cortes-Morales
Respondent: Suzanne R. Hastings
Case Number: 2:2013cv00057
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Brunswick Office
County: Wayne
Referring Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 24, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 11 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Cortes-Morales's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation are without merit and are overruled. Cortes-Morales's petition is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/24/2013. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cortes-Morales v. Hastings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jorge Cortes-Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Suzanne R. Hastings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.