Houston v. Elan Financial Services
Plaintiff: Clark A. Houston
Defendant: Elan Financial Services
Case Number: 2:2014cv00119
Filed: August 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Brunswick Office
County: McIntosh
Presiding Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting 17 Elan's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/24/2015. (csr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Houston v. Elan Financial Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clark A. Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elan Financial Services
Represented By: K. Marc Barre, Jr.
Represented By: D. Lee Clayton
Represented By: Brian J. Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?