Favors-Morrell et al v. United States et al
| Angela Favors-Morrell and Tony L. Morrell |
| United States, Edward J. Tarver, Melissa S. Mundell, James D. Durham, Thomas Clarkson and T. Shane Mayes |
| 2:2015cv00024 |
| February 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brunswick Office |
| Glynn |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER dismissing as moot 36 Motion For Legislative Consent to Waive Sovereign Immunity and 39 Motion to Strike; granting the Government's 16 Motion to Dismiss and the Individuals Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/8/2016. (ca)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting Defendants' 24 Motion to Stay all proceedings, including discover pending a ruling by the Court on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (docs. 16, 22). It is further ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days following the Court&# 039;s ruling on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, should this case remain pending before the Court, the parties are directed to again meet and confer pursuant to Rule 26(f). Additionally, the parties are to file a Rule 26(f) Report within seven (7) days of the Rule 26(f) conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 8/3/2015. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
