Buggs v. Dover et al
| William Avery Buggs |
| John Dover, Cedrick Frazier, Jonathan Rodriguez, Brett Poziombka, Robert Strickland, Michael Diestel and Randy Austin |
| 2:2016cv00105 |
| July 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brunswick Office |
| Glynn |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 . Court dismisses complaint and denies plaintiff leave to appeal informa pauperis. Directing clerk to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/24/16. (slt)
|
|
Filing
7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to follow this Court's Order. It is further RECOMMENDED that the C ourt DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 9/30/2016). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/16/2016. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
