Caicedo v. Stone
Alfredo Caicedo |
Stacey N. Stone |
3:2022cv00085 |
July 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Dudley H Bowen |
Brian K Epps |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER directing service of the #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/23/2022. (ca) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Respondent's #5 MOTION to Dismiss be granted, the #1 Petition be dismissed without prejudice, this civil action be closed, and an appropriate judgment of dismissal be entered. Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/23/2022. (ca) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #5 MOTION to Dismiss. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Petitioner to file a response to the motion to dismiss within fourteen days. Thereafter, the Court will rule on the motion, and if Petitioner still fails to respond, the Court will deem the motion unopposed. The Clerk is directed to notify the Court of the status of this case at the expiration of the fourteen days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/6/22. (loh) |
Set/Reset Deadline as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 9/20/2022. (loh) |
Filing 6 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Attorney General of the U.S. on 8/9/22. USMS Service Remark - Certificate of Service was signed by E. Sase on 8/9/22. (wwp) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Stacey N. Stone. Responses due by 8/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ward Declaration)(Leithart, Otto) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION to Dismiss. (thb) |
Filing 4 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to Stacey N. Stone on 8/5/22, USMS Service Remark - Certificate of Service was signed by V. Johnekins on 8/5/22. (wwp) |
Filing 3 U.S. Marshal Return Executed as to U.S. Attorney Civil Process Clerk on 8/4/22, USMS Service Remark - Certificate of Service was signed by K. Daniels on 8/4/22. (wwp) |
Filing 2 ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the #1 Petition and this Order by registered or certified mail upon: (1) the Attorney General of the United States; (2) the named Respondent; and (3) the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the SDGA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 7/29/2022. (ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/29/2022: #1 Prepared 285 forms) (ca). |
Set Deadlines: Compliance re #2 Order due by 8/1/2022. (ca) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Alfredo Caicedo.(wwp) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number Aug030974. (wwp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Caicedo v. Stone | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Alfredo Caicedo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Stacey N. Stone | |
Represented By: | Otto Woelke Leithart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.