v. Dublin Division
| Dublin Division |
| 3:2025tc05000 |
| December 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Contract: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CV325-013 Bowen/Epps assigned and uploaded to the pleadings queue - Complaint - NORMA BIBIANO as next friend to minor child, A.R., and administrator for the Estate of JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ BIBIANO v. JOSHUA GARRETT, MICHAEL PAULK, RONNEISHA MOORE, ARLENE HUNT, VERONICA STEWART, and ANDREW McFARLANE . Fee paid: Receipt # AGASDC-4000902, $405(Smith, Wingo) Modified on 2/13/2025 (cmr). |
| Filing 1 CV325-002 Bowen/Epps assigned and uploaded to the pleadings queue - Complaint (IFP) - Sterling v. O'Malley (Claxton, Edward) Modified on 1/10/2025 (cmr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: v. Dublin Division | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dublin Division | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
