Ross v. Fogam et al
| Milton Ross |
| David Milton, Robert B. Humes, Eric Fogam and Jack Koon |
| 4:2011cv00114 |
| May 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER dismissing as moot 20 Motion for Default Judgment; dismissing as moot 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/9/2013. (loh)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this Court dismissing this case without prejudice for 14 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 7/15/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER directing all parties to be served. Any objections must be filed with the Clerk of Court not later than July 7, 2011 re 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Milton Ross. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/23/2011. (loh)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 7 Motion for waiver of cost and security. Ross is ORDERED to show cause within 14 days of this Order why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to answer honestly the questions on the civil complaint form and IFP form. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 06/15/2011. (lmm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
