Deason v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
| John Deason |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Cleco Corporation, Dwayne Gibson and Lucius Bobbit |
| 4:2015cv00220 |
| August 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/15/16. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Stay discovery and all related deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/21/16. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER dismissing as moot 19 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; dismissing as moot 30 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/25/2016. (loh)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 44 Motion to Amend Complaint and Extend Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/23/2016. (loh)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 23 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hav vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 10/13/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 11 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice; granting 12 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/1/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
6
GENERAL ORDER: Report of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/11/2015. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
