Melton v. Great West Casualty Company et al
| James R. Melton |
| Great West Casualty Company, Georgia Freightways Corporation, David J. Gibbons, Direct Chassislink, Inc., South Atlantic Consolidated Chassis Pool LLC, Interpool, Inc., CMA-CGM (America) LLC and Consolidated Chassis Management LLC |
| 4:2016cv00275 |
| October 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 6 Motion to Remand. This case is remanded to the State Court of Chatham County, Georgia. All pending motions are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 9/29/17. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's arguments concerning collateral estoppel within 20 days from the date of this Order re 6 MOTION to Remand and Attorney Fees and Incorporated Brief filed by James R. Melton. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 6/22/17. (loh)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Stay. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all deadlines and discovery in this matter be stayed until such time as Plaintiff's Motion for Remand and for Attorney Fees has been ruled upon. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 12/20/16. (jlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
