Davis v. Chatham County - Savannah, GA et al
Edward Eugene Davis |
Teena Lynette Branch, Chatham County - Savannah, GA, Margaret Deleon, Abby Brown, Lindretta G. Kramer, William S. Lewis and Joseph F. Bandy, III |
4:2019cv00038 |
February 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that #1 Complaint filed by Edward Eugene Davis should be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. ( Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2019). ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Edward Eugene Davis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 03/18/2019. (evk) |
Filing 6 CONSENT by Prisoner Edward Eugene Davis to collection of fees. (trb) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Edward Eugene Davis. (trb) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 03/06/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 02/20/2019. (evk) |
Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Edward Eugene Davis. (evk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Eugene Davis. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(evk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Edward Eugene Davis against All Defendants.(evk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.