Attia v. Memorial Health et al
Joel Barton Ahia and Joel Barton Attia |
Memorial Health Systems, Jerry Minchew, Memorial Health, Paul Re'ally, Tommy Dutton, Steve Doe and Delilah Sayre |
4:2021cv00098 |
April 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER vacating #7 Report and Recommendations; granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #12 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Joel Barton Attia. Plaintiff is directed to file within 14 days of this Order a notice confirming his current physical and mailing address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/27/2021. (ca) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance re #14 due by 6/10/2021. (ca) |
Filing 13 Signature Page by Joel Barton Attia re #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (pts) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Reconsideration/RESPONSE in reference to #7 Report and Recommendations, #6 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Joel Barton Attia. (pts) Modified on 5/24/2021 (JH). Modified on 5/27/2021 (ca). |
Filing 11 Settlement Conference Worksheet, by Joel Barton Attia. (jlh) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 5/28/2021.) After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. (jlh) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Joel Barton Attia. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (jlh) |
Filing 8 OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendations (Motion to Show Cause Why Proceedings Should Not be Dismissed), by Joel Barton Attia. (jlh) |
Filing 7 ***VACATED per #14 *** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the case be dismissed re #1 Complaint and denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/12/2021. (ca) Modified on 5/24/2021 (JH). Modified on 5/27/2021 (JH). |
Filing 6 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 5/12/2021. (ca) Modified on 5/24/2021 (JH). |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, by Joel Barton Attia. (Attachments: #1 Attachments.) REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(jlh) |
Filing 4 ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a complete and current application for leave to proceed IFP within 14 days of this Order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to include with this Order a copy the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs form (AO239) for plaintiffs use. (Show Cause Response due by 4/23/2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 4/9/21. (wwp) |
Filing 3 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/6/2021. (ca) |
Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (ca) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joel Barton Ahia. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joel Barton Ahia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.